Stowell labels business plans as ‘rubbish.’

 

Stowell casts the deciding vote against squash.

Brian Stowell casts the deciding vote against Squash after making duplicitous comments.

Commissioner should have declared a conflict of interest.

Definition of ‘Conflict of interest.’

1. A situation that has the potential to undermine the impartiality of a person because of the possibility of a clash between the person’s self-interest and professional-interest or public-interest.

2. A situation where a party’s responsibility to a second-party limits its ability to discharge its responsibility to a third-party.

Stowell alleges ‘Unfit to work with young people’ and ‘former friend of Reggie Kray.’

These comments are untrue and show a prima facie case for liable legal action against Brian Stowell.

Witness Statements revealing Brian Stowell’s gloating behaviour.

On Friday 9^th April 2010 prior to the vote to decide the new tenant for the squash courts (held on 19^th April) Brian Stowell was described as gesticulating wildly and talking in a very happy, gleeful and loud and inappropriate manner about the loss of the squash courts and the demise of the facility.